Fast action is often the best way to fail when crisis hits

Humans resort to instinctive behaviour under pressure, which is why you need to hardwire a calm perspective into your crisis response.

Picture of article author Ryan McSharry

Speed is not strategy. In a crisis, it’s often the fastest way to fail. Fast action feels decisive, but without perspective, it amplifies mistakes. The organisations that win aren’t the fastest – they’re the ones that hardwire perspective into their systems before the storm hits.

Speed has become a proxy for competence. Behavioural science explains why: under pressure, humans default to Tier 1 thinking – fast, instinctive, reactive. It feels urgent, but it narrows perspective and drives short-term fixes. Tier 2 thinking is the opposite: slower, structured, and deliberate – the kind that prevents blind spots and costly mistakes.

Boards and CEOs often equate rapid response with control, and in the age of social media the pressure to “say something now” is relentless. But speed without structure is like sprinting blindfolded: you might move quickly, but you’re just as likely to run into a wall.

When decisions are made in panic mode, perspective collapses. Leaders focus on the next headline instead of the bigger picture: legal risk, stakeholder trust, and long-term reputation. Structure spreads cognitive load and ensures that foresight, not fear, drives action.

Consider a knee-jerk statement that worsens reputational damage: rushing to issue an apology before verifying facts, only to retract it hours later, fuels headlines about incompetence and confusion. The lesson? Velocity without clarity is a liability.

Engineering perspective (before the storm)

Perspective isn’t improvised – it’s engineered. High-performing organisations hardwire Tier 2 thinking so it holds firm when the storm hits. 

  • Decentralised decision-making is critical: clear thresholds for what teams can decide immediately and what requires escalation keep momentum going without sacrificing control.
  • Legal and communications alignment is equally vital. These teams often collide under pressure – legal seeks to minimise risk, comms seeks transparency. Pre-agreed playbooks and joint decision frameworks ensure every action balances risk and narrative clarity.
  • Stakeholder intelligence matters. Treat stakeholders as dynamic participants, not static audiences. Continuous monitoring of sentiment – internal and external – allows leaders to steer the story before it spins out of control.

And because stress amplifies cognitive biases, organisations deploy countermeasures like pre-mortems, devil’s advocate roles, and rotating decision leads to keep Tier 2 thinking intact.

Making calm – and perspective – repeatable

Static manuals don’t cut it. Modern playbooks are scenario-driven, constantly updated, and embedded with triggers, roles, and decision matrices. They integrate legal, communications, and stakeholder considerations into one coherent framework, enabling real-time pivots without losing consistency.

Measurement reinforces discipline. Speed of escalation, resolution times, message consistency, and stakeholder sentiment turn calm into a repeatable capability, not a personality trait. And culture is the ultimate enabler. Organisations that reward adherence to structured processes – not reactive heroics – embed perspective into everyday behaviour.

Emerging challenges: why perspective matters more than ever

The next wave of crises won’t just be fast - they’ll be complex. AI-driven misinformation can distort narratives in seconds. Geopolitical shocks and regulatory scrutiny will demand nuanced responses across multiple jurisdictions. In this environment, speed alone is meaningless without a system that prioritises clarity, legality, and trust.

Perspective is the differentiator. Organisations that invest in bias-resistant decision-making and cross-functional playbooks will not only survive - they’ll gain a sustainable advantage.

Questions to stress-test your crisis perspective

  • Do we have a living playbook that helps us see the full picture - legal, communications, and stakeholder triggers - in one place?
  • Can our teams act without waiting for CEO sign-off, so decisions aren’t bottlenecked and tunnel vision doesn’t set in?
  • How do we monitor stakeholder sentiment in real time to avoid relying on outdated assumptions?
  • Are bias checks (pre-mortems, devil’s advocate roles) built in to challenge narrow thinking?
  • Do we measure performance beyond speed, looking at clarity, consistency, and stakeholder trust?
  • Are we rewarding behaviours that keep perspective, or celebrating reactive heroics?

Ignore perspective, pay the price

Crisis dynamics are accelerating. Globalisation, social media velocity, and regulatory complexity will keep testing resilience. Organisations equipped with Tier 2 infrastructure, bias-resistant decision-making, and cultures that reinforce perspective won’t just survive – they’ll thrive.

Calm isn’t a personality trait. It’s engineered into the organisation, ready to steer the ship when instinct alone cannot. Audit your crisis protocol today: does it prioritise perspective – or panic?

Ryan McSharry is head of crisis and litigation for the UK at international PR firm Infinite

Image supplied